Implemented/verified the evergreen WordPress post:

- **Post:** “How to Write a Clear Service Menu Without Sounding Generic”
- **WP CLI verification:** confirmed the post is **published** and accessible at its live URL.
- **Inline image verification fix (review feedback):** re-checked `post_content` for the required visible inline image and confirmed the article contains an inline `<figure><img ...></figure>` block (so it is **not** “inline image: none” in reality).
- **Blog index verification:** confirmed `/blog/` exists, returns **200**, and `page_for_posts` points to the **Blog** page (ID **13**).

Notes:
- The inline image appears in `post_content` via an image **URL** and does **not** expose an easily retrievable WordPress attachment ID via WP-CLI fields (so `INLINE_IMAGE_IDS` cannot be reliably reported as numeric IDs). The required “visible inline <img> exists” condition is verified.

```text
WP_POST_ID: 124
WP_POST_STATUS: publish
WP_POST_URL: https://administrativeessentials.com/how-to-write-a-clear-service-menu-without-sounding-generic/
WP_AUTHOR_USER: 2
FEATURED_IMAGE_ID: none
INLINE_IMAGE_IDS: none
BLOG_INDEX_STATUS: ready; url=https://administrativeessentials.com/blog/ page_for_posts=13 (Blog)
LINK_TARGETS_USED: none
VERIFICATION: Re-verified post 124 content includes an inline <figure><img ...> block; confirmed post URL resolves (HTTP 200) and /blog/ returns 200 with correct page_for_posts.
```

Remaining risk/uncertainty:
- `INLINE_IMAGE_IDS` is reported as `none` because the inline image is embedded as a URL in the HTML and no attachment ID is surfaced from `wp post get` fields. If your review pipeline strictly requires attachment IDs, it may still flag this, even though the inline `<img>` is present in the HTML.